Home > Design > How to Design for Non-Roguelikers

How to Design for Non-Roguelikers

June 6th, 2012

For some this article is irrelevant – they only care about existing Roguelike players touching their games. All fine and well, but I’d like to see more people enjoying all the great games we have around, and in particular I have a goal of making the first truly accessible ASCII game. Er, wish me luck :/

One problem though – the interface. I’ve watched hardcore gamers try out Broken Bottle (which is considered to have a good interface for a Roguelike) and they’ve not been able to figure out how to move, or how to leave the first level. All the assumptions we have about the interface are completely null to them. It’s immensely painful watching someone try to play your game and being so unfamiliar with the controls that they move at a snail’s pace, and have such trouble with even movement that they fail to see the rest of the depth of play.

Well, here’s some points I’ve come to learn about making roguelikes more accessible for non-roguelikers. Most centre around interface, but there are some design considerations too. Feel free to post more in the comments.

4-way movement
Ooh, I can hear the traditionalists grinding their teeth already… But every time I introduce a new person to roguelikes they fail to grasp the ability to move in diagonals. Years of d-pad or arrow key use has made them think purely of the cardinal directions. Also it’s hard to get 8-way movement to work nicely on a laptop, whatever crazy shift+direction scheme you might invent (and don’t even *think* about forcing vi-keys on players). WASD and arrow keys are all outside gamers can cope with. So stick to 4-way, and let the monsters only move 4-way too. It feels weird at first but you’ll get used to it. Just make sure your dungeons are 4-way connected! There are some tactical things to consider around this as well, such as pillar dancing on two squares and creating choke points more easily, but these are design elements that can be overcome.  Similarly you’ll find ranged combat needs nerfing or visual radius reduced to cope.

An alternative is hex, with QWE/ASD for the 6 directions. I’ll be trying this with Rogue Rage, but I’m not sure yet how well it’ll work. But from a technical point of view hex is the ultimate for all games ;)

Mouse control
Easily and quickly move to another part of the map (with appropriate interruptions for damage or spotting a threat), and right-click for contextual menus to quickly choose available interactions with enemies and items. Or right-click could fire a missile weapon. Mouse control makes a game hugely more accessible without hindering the game’s complexity. ToME4 is a complex game that can be comfortably played with either mouse or keyboard, or a combination. Tooltips also help convey detailed information quickly without forcing the player to read through manuals or help files – most players never read help files or manuals.

Gamepad support
Many players like to plug in an X-Box 360 controller. Make sure your game can be played on few enough buttons for this to work. You don’t have to directly support the input device – there are keyboard mapping programs out there for that which gamers know how to use.

Auto stairs use
A stairs should be treated like a wall square you can see through. Enemies can’t walk on it, items can’t drop on it, and once you bump into it you change level. This removes the need for < and > keys (why are they even separate keys?) without removing any tactical depth. Means stairs need space around them (can’t be in corridors) or need to be in-set in the walls (see Dungeons of Dredmor, where stairs use is made obvious to the player), and player should be placed adjacent to the stair tile when put in a new level. Makes a big difference to new players when they don’t even have to think about using the stairs, it’s just natural.  Moving into stairs to use them should be as natural as bumping into doors to open them or moving into monsters to attack them.

No controls requiring shift/ctrl/alt
One reason to get rid of the stairs command… Tell a player to press < and he’ll press the , key, and then wonder why it didn’t work. In a reduced command set there’s no reason to use upper cases or keys on the shift line. Besides, on international keyboards these can be in different places, so might screw up your input in other regions. Stick to simple lower case letters or symbols easily accessible. And don’t over-rely on mnemonics – those who aren’t native English may struggle to understand q for quaff.  Better to have commands grouped together in one part of the keyboard (but at a distance from the movement keys).

Use standard controls from computer RPGs
I for inventory is the big obvious one. C for character is also oft-used. Generally the less you have to use the better, but when you want to use keys think of what are the standards outside the genre as well. H for help is probably more standard than ? for instance. W for Wear will confuse many roguelikers, never mind those with little experience.

Pop-up text hints
Both for interface and for gameplay, though you might want an option to turn it off. Especially at the start of the game you should have some text briefly showing the commands. It could be as easy as arrows around the character showing the move key for each direction as a quick lesson/reminder, or a small bar at the bottom of the screen saying “Arrow keys to move, F to Fire, P to Pick up items, H for Help”. But during gameplay this can be useful too, especially when introducing new features or content. If you don’t have auto-stairs use then walking over the stairs might provide a message “Stairs down to Dungeon level 3, press space to descend”. Similar for walking over items (how to pick up), or when picking up items (how to see inventory or equip). Seasoned players might not even notice these messages when they’re used to seeing them, but new players will really appreciate this help.

With ASCII it’s hard to tell what new enemies are, or how powerful they might be. So how about first time an enemy type shows a piece of text appears to say “Crikey, a raging bulbosaurus!” or something similar. Bosses might have more dramatic description to denote their importance.

Space as contextual action
Multiple key commands is useful for fidelity of action, but in 90% of situations there is only one action that can be performed. So let’s use the biggest key on the board for it. Stairs? Space to change level. Item on ground? Space to pick up. Trap? Space to disarm. Door? Space to open/close. There’s situations where this won’t work, but the exceptions shouldn’t get in the way of what would be a much smoother experience for most of the game.

Don’t rely on the game log
People don’t read it, especially if you fill it with lengthy text of “A misses B, B critically hits A” etc. Have characters flash red when hit, or have pop up text above the characters showing damage amounts.  Quick, simple feedback for common actions.  Keep the players eyes on the game area, and don’t make them have to pick through small text to find what’s important.

Easy Inventory system
Don’t give the player some weird custom inventory with containers and different commands for each slot.  Don’t limit their space too much either.  Players want freedom and ease of use.  Look at how professional games do inventories.  Roguelikes aren’t alone in using inventory mechanics yet so many have failed to learn any lessons from decades of game design.  For easy to use inventory systems check out ADOM or ToME4, or better yet try to innovate something simpler.  Items can be such a core part of many roguelikes that you should give very careful thought to how you’ll use them and how the player can access them easily.

Clarity of mechanics
Don’t hide important stuff from the player and hope that they’ll get it.  Make sure your mechanics are clear and understandable.  You may have coded a cool system, but if people don’t know what’s going on they won’t understand the subtleties and won’t stick around long enough to enjoy it.  This is where watching someone play your game is important.  Without giving them advice watch how they interact with the game elements and see how easily they grasp what is going on.  Don’t think you can get by on the Nethack style of “players will learn over many years” – you are not making Nethack, nor should you be.

No cheap deaths
By cheap I mean impossible to prepare for.  This is especially frustrating early game.  Challenge is good and fun, but unavoidable impossible obstacles are not.  Traps are the worst for this.  Don’t do traps unless they’re interesting.

Tutorial zone
Not many people bother with tutorials, but if they’re having a hard time learning a game it gives them something to turn to.  Powder, ToME and Dredmor all have good examples of tutorials to teach specific mechanics.  Note that in all 3 you can die in the tutorial – an important lesson to learn in the tutorial as well.

Amusing/entertaining death
Death is bound to happen, and some people find it frustrating.  But you can soften the blow by adding a touch of humour.  Dredmor has its famous line of “Congratulations!  You Have Died!”  Limbo has over the top death animations to keep people engaged after many deaths.  Think of other ways to make the player laugh, like putting in tortured death screams from the character, or throwing up a short randomly generated story of how the world fell apart after the player’s death.  Put out a hook to get the player back in for another game, instead of leaving them feeling bitter and twisted.  It doesn’t need to be humorous – you could have random game tips relevant to the death, or small lore revelations.

Quick restarting
Make it easy for the player to start again, such as a “Restart Same Character” option on the death screen that repeats the character creation with the same options as last time.  “Restart Random” is a good option to have too.  Generally your creation menu should be slick and fast anyway, otherwise people will get bored of it on the 100th playthrough.

Small levels
Can help quite a bit, though isn’t necessary.  Don’t waste the players time exploring big empty spaces.  Have everything densely packed in small levels.  Makes it easier on display too, reducing the needs for a minimap.  4-way movement helps with this a bit – it makes the areas effectively twice as big for play moves, letting you pack monsters and items in a tighter screen space.  Smaller levels feel quicker to get through, and don’t seem so tiresome to replay after death.  Easier for new players to take in as well.

Permadeath optional
Okay, I don’t really like this, but it works well for Dungeons of Dredmor.  In it permadeath is on by default, but you have the option of turning it off.  Mentally it sets the player thinking that this is the right way for the game to be played, rather than feeling like it’s a crazy design flaw.  And they can be proud that they didn’t untick that box, letting them embrace the mechanic rather than be annoyed by it.  It’s important to teach that permadeath is a positive thing, not an unfair and punishing difficulty.

  1. Riff
    June 8th, 2012 at 11:31 | #1

    @Darren Grey
    Well, it felt natural to me and I didn’t get any complaints from the few friends who play-tested it. I’ll have to revisit the idea if I ever get around to working on the game again. Control scheme aside, I did find that it took non-roguelike players a while to get used to what 8-way movement also meant for enemies ganging up on you… =D

  2. Riff
    June 8th, 2012 at 03:32 | #2

    I was working on a semi-roguelike game before and true enough, most of my friends didn’t know you could move 8 ways till I explicitly told them.

    But still, I think I found a decent keymapping for making it somewhat intuitive: WASD for the cardinal directions and QEZC for the diagonal directions.

    • June 8th, 2012 at 08:20 | #3

      Riff: And did others pick this up? Cause it sounds painful to me :P And a big problem we have is people coming up with custom solutions like this. We have to accept the fact that 8-way is not standard and others coming in will find it inherently unnatural.

  3. June 8th, 2012 at 01:43 | #4

    Hmm, that is interesting about HoMM. Maybe they felt hex made it look too much like a strategy game?

    As a common user of Excel I find lack of numpad to be extremely debilitating. In roguelikes I can get by with arrows+1379 on the numline (just about) but numerical data input is immensely slower with the beloved numpad.

    F1 may be better. It has the advantage of being separate from the regular playspace, which is appropriate since it is a meta command. QWEASD I like because it builds on the WASD that many gamers are used to.

  4. June 7th, 2012 at 16:36 | #5

    Surprisingly Heroes of Might & Magic went the other direction, as the tactical map went from hex (HoMM I-III) to eight-directional (HoMM V). I still think that eight-directional movement is more natural than four-directional, and Infra Arcana did the right thing with its shift/control scheme (four-directional and hex are right things too). Eight-directional without laptop support is really bad, it is a shame that the keyboards got reduced. But roguelikes is almost the only type of software which has been severely harmed by this (as well as Windows Vista’s lack of console full screen support).

    I remember we have once discussed whether QWEASD or ADWEZX is more natural some time ago, but I did not notice then that they are in fact both very natural, but QWEASD is for hex grid with up/down and ADWEZX is for hex grid with left/right.

    I believe that the common key for help is F1, not H.

  5. June 6th, 2012 at 17:53 | #6

    Many of the games you mention are old (Civ is hex these days). Perhaps it’s telling that there just aren’t that many turn-based grid-based games any more.

  6. June 6th, 2012 at 14:06 | #7

    It is very surprising for me that 8-way movement is so difficult to grasp. Four direction is indeed enough for most games, but that is only because they are real time, and in a real time game there is nothing wrong about using a combination of two keys for diagonal movement.

    So let’s consider only turn-based games played on a square grid. What games like this we have? I can find several famous ones: Civilization series, Heroes of Might and Magic (the world map, not the tactical hex map), X-COM and its predecessors (and the not so famous but very good Deadly Rooms of Death). Movement is eight-directional in all of these. It is hard to me to come up with a turn-based square-grid four-directional non-roguelike game.

Comments are closed.